Gary O'Neall
Gary O'Neall
Based on the tech call on 24 Sept 2024: We will move this to 3.1 - it has no breaking change and the inconsistency between the model and the diagram...
@maxhbr - Can you take a quick look and give @bact feedback Discussed on the 15 Oct 2024 tech call
@alcroito - we've been having some discussions on this topic on our weekly [SPDX Implementers meeting](https://github.com/spdx/meetings?tab=readme-ov-file#implementers-group-meetings). We now have the generated model files that implement SPDX 3.0.1 available in a...
@karsten-klein - Thanks for raising the issue. I agree, it should be deterministic. There is already a sorting in the JSON output, it must somehow miss the hash algorithms. Since...
@karsten-klein - Let me know if this is still an issue with the 2.0.0-RC2 version of the tools. If this is still an issue, can you post an example how...
It looks like this PR is outdated - I'll go ahead and close it - @mkurzman - feel free to re-open a new PR based on the current profile-operations if...
Since we have to write custom code to validate a license expression anyway, is there much incremental value in having the SHACL validation of the map? In general I'm OK...
Ping @JPEWdev - Please review the above comments and rebase to the latest
@JPEWdev - Can you review the requested change?
I wonder if I should go ahead and setup the 3.0.1 redirects now since they are live. We should probably wait for the 3.0 redirects until final release. @kestewart @bact...