Gary O'Neall
Gary O'Neall
@bact - how much more work would it be to use the spdx-python-model in the tools-python vs using it directly here? If the incremental work is small, the community would...
thanks @bact - I took a quick look and it LGTM. I should be on the next implementers call if you want to discuss any design options. @jspeed-meyers - also...
Decision - 3.0 will redirect to the latest.
Thanks @fschoenm - agree with your suggestion. I'm working on upgrading the utility to support the SPDX 3.0 spec - after that, I'll look into implementing your suggestion.
Per comment in SPDX minutes - moving this to post 3.0.1
> @goneall noted. > > Btw, since we only have a change log file in the spdx-spec repo (and not in the spdx-3-model repo), should I also include the link...
@bact - sorry to bother you about one more merge conflict resolution. Since @kestewart has now reviewed, I can merge as soon as the conflicts are resolved.
Really good catch @bact Agree with the proposal. I can take care of the new redirect to the new path structure - just need to add it to issue #1094...
> The statement in first bullet is not accurate, as we may as well declare that `https://spdx.org/a/3.0.x/b` is the same as `https://spdx.org/a/3.0.y/b` in the ontology. This would be a good...
- We decided to keep the "3.0" references on the public website and redirect to the latest patch release. - The MAJOR.MINOR.PATCH is for IRIs like https://spdx.org/rdf/3.0.1/spdx-context.jsonld - For the...