Gary Ewan Park
Gary Ewan Park
Wait, there seems to be something wrong here... Chocolatey already had a 0.7.1 release, dated back to 2015. Not sure what is going on there. I will have a dig...
@belidzs having the IVcsProvider is still likely to be needed. @akordowski has expressed an interest in adding DI to the project for other reason, and we are likely going to...
I was more thinking along the lines of: `public class GiteaProvider : VcsProviderBase, IVcsProvider` And then only having the overrideable methods in the VcsProviderBase class.
VcsProviderBase doesn't need to inherit from IVcsProvider. The base class will only contain the methods that were private in the GitHubVcsProvider, with the default implementation, that can then be overridden...
I am confused... How does the files that have changed enable JIRA support?
Or is this a Work in Progress?
Coolio, just wanted to check :-) Was curious what you do here, as I will do something similar in GitReleaseManger :-)
@akordowski @AdmiringWorm I have no real opinion on this either way. Which one would we prefer?
@akordowski this comment isn't related to this issue, is it?
So, sounds like `This_Is_A_Test()` is the winner. No objections from me in adopting this.