George Knee
George Knee
The downside of this is that the other addresses will no longer be tracked in the repository, and therefore not inspectable by humans / services / software packages that want...
Yeah you're right that should work well. I think I was skipping all the way to "only store the SystemConfig address" which is not what this ticket is about.
I'm not aware of a reason for having two separate formats in the repo, so standardising to one seems pretty fair. Can you expand on why you favour JSON? I...
It won't be easy/clean to put the code in the `superchain` module because it may cause dependency conflicts or cycles.
I made an attempt by reimplementing types from `go-ethereum` inside `superchain`. But that started to snowball very quickly.
> Thoughts on being more abstract with language as to not enshrine the optimism collective deeply into the protocol itself? its free software that anybody can use, perhaps we can...
@s1na are you still actively working on this PR? It is of interest to our project so we would be willing to devote some time to helping getting it over...
> We really want to get v2 out instead of packing more features into v1. Fair enough, we can use both side by side in our project without too much...
> This is definitely a bug, there are a total of 2048 predeploys, that is bigger than a 1 byte namespace Updated here [51b1497](https://github.com/ethereum-optimism/specs/pull/339/commits/51b14977ede24ae05360500f6831e847a5233ef0)
https://github.com/ethereum-optimism/superchain-registry/pull/373 is a sketch at a solution for this.