Garrett LeSage

Results 767 comments of Garrett LeSage

![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/10246/180750495-e1ae7018-cc04-44c4-a7ba-6541e31a787d.png) If the filesystem is corrupt and it has to be deleted and restored from backup, it's not supposed to be a _warning_, it's actuall a critical _error_.

Wow, this error! :open_mouth: ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/10246/180758413-e261da27-62b2-464e-9c2f-5da554d8e727.png)

Is there a way to determine which volumes are doing what within this UI? ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/10246/180759250-3d294aff-d9d1-4b00-8cdd-dbf083cb1cfe.png) For example, sdb is there for the striping, data will be on sdd, sde is...

OK, one last observation on this quick look: - Can we make formatting a part of the process, instead of a second step? (After creating a logical volume, everyone's going...

I was thinking we should show the disks horizontally, not vertically. Consider the standard RAID illustrations, as seen on https://dahuawiki.com/Backup/RAID_Intro (but look similar everywhere else): RAID 0: ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/10246/184895575-dce8dd1b-9628-476a-97ab-a0c87e61fa4f.png) RAID 1:...

So, taking my comment above into account, your version could look something like this instead: ![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/10246/184908326-46720735-4b55-403a-9bf4-2814a0e4b5f0.png) And mirrored disks could perhaps be something like this, where there's less vertical space,...

> There is no such thing as a RAID level with parity and mirroring. Ah, right. Of course. I was just trying to make some quick mockups. :wink: > I'll...

I've been wanting to redesign the accounts page for a while and just found this very old issue. There are a lot of great suggestions here and I would like...

First pass at redesigning the accounts page to accomodate the feature list mentioned above is @ https://github.com/cockpit-project/cockpit/discussions/17604. I still need to finish up the details pages for both user accounts...

Thanks for filing the issue! It looks like we should ship a `/robots.txt` by default with: ``` User-agent: * Disallow: / ``` More details: https://www.robotstxt.org/robotstxt.html