Francisco Giordano
Francisco Giordano
Replying to https://github.com/ethereum/solidity/issues/597#issuecomment-2691649251. Maybe this helps clarify what I was expecting: given `contract A { uint x; }` I'd expect `type(A).storageBase` to be the slot at which `x` is stored....
Ah, right, I'm not interested in reading this value outside of a contract. I can see how that's incompatible with `type(X).storageBase`. I actually want something like `thisContract.storageBase`. In terms of...
@abcoathup I believe it needs to be an EIP because it concerns the `eth_signTypedData` JSON-RPC method. Can you confirm? This is like an extended EIP-712, which is considered a proper...
Moving to https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/pull/693.
> Otherwise how would you know what token was minted? Do you mean when you invoke this function off-chain? In that case you would use the `Transfer` event, and in...
This EIP hasn't been included in Prague and there is no indication it will be included any time soon.
This is a major limitation. Could this be addressed by providing a Git server as a compatibility layer with npm instead of a custom registry? ```json "dependencies": { "@std/cli": "git+https://jsr.io/@std/cli.git#semver:^1.0.0"...
Previous discussion: https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/issues/222
Would really like to see this. On top of the ones mentioned in the issue, I'd add custom errors and user defined value types. It's currently weird because it's possible...
This definitely isn't world-ending priority but I think we should consider it a bug with medium rather than low impact.