Francisco Giordano

I'm pretty sure that comment is not related to this issue. Even if you have installed [email protected] in your repo, test-helpers has its own dependency of [email protected], and `expectEvent` should...

Thanks for bringing this up! It seems that `evm_mine` together with the timestamp parameter is equivalent to our `time.increaseTo` helper. I think the simplest fix would be to change `increaseTo`...

Yeah exactly, since our time helpers already mine a block we can use `evm_mine` directly. @simondlr Are you at all interested in contributing this change? :slightly_smiling_face:

`audit` sounds like it makes strong guarantees. I would say `lint`.

We're considering building something for users to "install" the contracts they want into their source code (rather than node modules). It's an early idea but it's definitely in our minds!

I've implemented this in a branch. Will open a PR soon.

One of the main things we should fix is the reference argument. It shouldn't be necessary to manually specify a string reference id, at least not in the way we...

We're planning to include the proxies in OpenZeppelin Contracts 3.1, including support for Solidity 0.6. There's no date for that release yet, but it might be about a month from...

We'll look into this in the next couple of days. Unless there's anything unexpected the migration should be easy. We'll post updates here once we have more certainty.

@orenyodfat Apologies for taking so long to reply. There is an initial migration of most contracts to Solidity 0.6 in the [`solc-0.6`](https://github.com/OpenZeppelin/openzeppelin-sdk/tree/solc-0.6/packages/lib/contracts) branch. It hasn't been tested though. Unfortunately, although...