Mourits de Beer

> Is this post for real? If you don't like it - write your own LLM and provide your own example. My God, the things people complain about ... especially...

I'd like to propose a few suggestions to consider for the 1.0.0 release: - Upgrade Python to 3.12 (I've tested locally and things pass smoothly) - review TODO / FIXME...

@dbluhm Thank you! That overview is very helpful. So, in summary, it'll be best for all of the models to stick with validating for an Ed25519 key? Except for maybe...

I looked at some repos for how BBS signatures are implemented -- [mattrglobal/bbs-signatures](https://github.com/mattrglobal/bbs-signatures) and [jsonld-signatures-bbs](https://github.com/mattrglobal/jsonld-signatures-bbs) -- afaict, the BBS verkey is base64 with at least 128 characters. There's a [table...

@andrewwhitehead Thanks! But, how do you mean I'm "decoding the base58-encoded key as base64"? The response we're getting from the `wallet_create_did` route, requesting did:key + BBS, returns a 132 character...

Yes, I indeed confused base58 and base64, because until now I wasn't told that the response is always in base58 :-) I could only tell that the indy verkey was...

There are many models with fields that require the `INDY_RAW_PUBLIC_KEY_VALIDATE` pattern. I've started with adding support for did:key + BBS in the following PR: #2470 Please review to see the...

The following scenario is for onboarding an issuer to our ecosystem. An issuer requires a public DID, and in order for the DID to be written to the ledger, the...

Everything passed locally. The PR Test failures seem like spurious json-ld context failures. 4 cases of: ``` FAILED aries_cloudagent/vc/vc_ld/tests/test_manager.py::test_store - pyld.jsonld.JsonLdError: ('Could not expand input before compaction.',) ```

Sadge. Integration test failures too