Eric Earl

Hey @raamana! Yeah, sorry for the silence. Shortly after I wrote this up I shifted gears for a while. I think I'll get back to this soon, but I can't...

Awesome! Thanks for the instructions! Documentation always helps. We'll check this out on our next occasion of using VisualQC for defacing evaluations.

I tried to apply something close to @dmoracze 's solution here, and it occurred to me there are so many competing standards for what roles or contributions should be called...

Oh! My colleague @dmoracze just pointed out: #338 Sorry! Ignore my last comment then.

I was just trying to request Ross review, sorry others!

Just an FYI since @tsalo linked me this to read: Our BEP036 is going to propose a change to allow sessions.tsv at the top-level so long as it has the...

Thank you @tsalo for the response! For those who come to this Issue and aren't sure what `phenotype/` TSV data is like, you can imagine it as form or survey...

@sappelhoff and @Remi-Gau , thank you for the discussion on this issue. I will attempt to write the conclusion of this discussion so far and please chime in if I...

@effigies This truth table perspective is perfectly timed and well curated for this conversation, thanks! ## On the 5th row of table 1 | Phenotype | `participants.tsv` | Subject directory...

@effigies Thank you for the complete response. I feel you brought up three points above I will try to summarize here: # 1. The comprehensive superset rule I love your...