Eric Earl

I forgot to mention I have a small example of the alternative 1 proposal here: https://openneuro.org/datasets/ds004654/file-display/dataset_description.json

@effigies That is a super-well-put response to my issue, thank you! I really like your point about consent language and considering whether OpenNeuro is the right repository given your study's...

@sappelhoff I don't think we have any differing opinions, so I am fully in favor of yours which all make sense here. So can I also send my working group...

@bendhouseart implemented Giscus at this point. Are we really still considering it? Should we close this issue?

@rhancockn The DCAN-Labs abcd-hcp-pipeline is actually quite flexible to data of most studies. You can read more about the pipeline's behavior here: https://collection3165.readthedocs.io/en/stable/pipeline/ They're also quite responsive to posting GitHub...

@kathy-snider Didn't we think of a solution for this and just never implemented it?

@DavidEWarrenPhD Thanks for pointing this out! We should remove most of that from the Dockerfile and credit kaczmarj for what came from their neurodocker. What happened was we used kaczmarj's...

@Remi-Gau Let's say I knew all the dataset sizes of all of OpenNeuro... what would be the best next move or two? ... And now I am seeing PR #651...

Yes. It is also causing errored validation on my old OpenNeuro dataset ds004215 (now ds005752). In our case there are 1,608 subjects with survey (`phenotype/`) data, but without `sub-*/` directory...

@effigies Cool, I will work on a PR to the spec now.