Eric Milles

For now, I'd stick with enhancing the DSLD so that you get the experience you are looking for. If you can't get there, all the bootstrapping is unneeded. Can you...

For `dependencies` you can hover over and it should display a type or method. This indicates that the `DSLDTypeLookup` knowns something about it. In terms of code completion within the...

Related discussion at #807

"Do you have plans to move also to a language server protocol based approach?"

I have been laying back, watching the LS/LSP mature a bit. I see that Spring Tools has moved to using this approach. Based on what I have seen and understood...

Thoughts: 1. implement a standalone language server pro: simpler to implement con: lesser functionality -- no joint compilation pro: could be its own project disconnected from groovy-eclipse with community support...

Thanks for that. Would you have time to review the GDT architecture and say if the approach would be acceptable for general JVM language support? https://spring.io/blog/2009/07/30/a-groovier-eclipse-experience I've had questions from...

@vogella The high-level design is this: 1. Provide content type extensions to the Java Source File. That is, Groovy sources are seen as Java sources, much like Java sources are...

@nniesen If you have identified an issue with Groovy tooling, please feel free to submit a new issue ticket with details. There were a couple historical efforts to get the...

Since 2.9.1 there have been some changes to the features that are pushed out to the update site. This happened before my time, so I am uncertain of the reasoning...