Benoit Daloze

@MSP-Greg Thanks, I applied a variant of the patch in r64855. Not sure #36 affects you, how are you running specs in parallel, with `-j`? That uses separate processes, so...

> I've got one more patch that removes some MinGW guards. PRs are welcome. > Maybe allow the random option to also be used with -j? Does it not work...

@MSP-Greg > So, what have I found? > > 1. The last run I did last night was the first where all twenty passed. Previously, most runs had one or...

Sounds like a VSCode extension/DAP debugger feature, so moving to oracle/graal. Although maybe Ruby needs to implement some interop message for this? There is no scope getScopeArguments() or so message...

We could maybe expose those as some kind of variable that would be listed in a scope's getMembers(), but not in Binding#local_variables (needed for compatibility). It would need to have...

I think you should be able to evaluate in that method `p(...)` and `p(*)`. Regarding `*` that changed in 3.1/3.2 I think so it might not work yet, but in...

It would be good to compare to what is done for a VSCode debugger for CRuby for this. Currently instance variables are included only if `getMembers(internal=true)`. Did you see ivars...

It seems not from from what you say in https://github.com/oracle/truffleruby/issues/2727#issue-1368191710. So I think this is tooling issue: * Sort members for the variables view (or if the language should do...

Tracked as GR-41722.

Could you try the `--core-as-internal` option? That should make the debugger not look into the core library. By default the core library is not internal because we want to list...