Emilia Hane
Emilia Hane
I'd like @mattsse to check it out too, think he has a better idea of what/why we are including
> `header not found: number 0x131088f` or `header for hash not found: hash 0x3d9046bfd79e0d10404c01cf236a09806400233a8ca4761aba4c61cb3d888c11` is that still your opinion? latter can be simplified: `header not found: hash `
> > do we always want to include the unknown block id prefix? > > I don't think this matches geth? > > Personally I'm not convinced we should try...
re-request review @mattsse @onbjerg
blocked by https://github.com/alloy-rs/alloy/pull/1127
> @emhane tests are failing and I think your merge revived a bunch of old files in the PR am aware @onbjerg , doesn't compile since blocked by https://github.com/paradigmxyz/reth/pull/7416#issuecomment-2269745597
finally fixed all conflicts here! re-request review also @mattsse
blocked by https://github.com/ethereum-optimism/optimism/pull/11759
not sure how to fix this test. necessary to get this merged in order to add the primitive traits module to the library, and import into `reth-node-types`. @mattsse
execution checkpoint being 0 hints that bedrock state hasn't been imported