ehmicky
ehmicky
I have opened several PRs to tackle most of the problems related to migrating to pure ES modules: - [x] https://github.com/netlify/zip-it-and-ship-it/pull/970 - [x] https://github.com/netlify/zip-it-and-ship-it/pull/971 - [x] https://github.com/netlify/zip-it-and-ship-it/pull/972 - [x] https://github.com/netlify/zip-it-and-ship-it/pull/973...
This is a nice feature. However, this is non-standard and creates a stronger coupling to esbuild.
The syntax is different though, and the set of formats not identical. The concept might be as old as JavaScript bundling, e.g. RequireJS [has it](https://requirejs.org/docs/plugins.html) (maybe it created it?).
Hi @mikeattara, Thanks for reaching out! Related: #135 and #30 We are investigating this problem, and will come back soon with an answer.
Hi @witcradg @ercgrat @Nisfan, Thanks for reporting this bug. I have trying to reproduce but have not been able to. Do you have a public repository that I could clone...
Hi @Muhammad-Tayyab1, This is a separate problem. Would it be possible for you to create a separate issue? Thanks.
Thanks for the additional debugging information @kijanawoodard.
Note: while our production builds (via buildbot) use Linux, a significant part of our Netlify CLI users are on Windows.
Ah ok @eduardoboucas, thanks for the precision. This makes sense!
@eduardoboucas Would this work with the new `esbuild` flow?