David Singer
David Singer
I'm not aware of _complaint_, I do worry about _risk_ and being excessively public about something that is quintessentially a member matter. We lay ourselves open to being interfered with,...
I'm not sure we need a WG (they are usually used to develop rec-track specs with patent commitments); an IG may suffice. I'm not saying that everything _has_ to be...
Nor do I think this is urgent...
I'm having a hard time thinking of a case where equal-basis public involvement and exposure was actively helpful. Can anyone?
I'm not sure if this is helpful, but perhaps if the concerns are (a) over decisions and (b) the ability of participants to get approval, join and plan travel in...
the question was raised because, alas, there was a disagreement and a problem (as is typically the case). sometimes members want to be able to say to chairs "you really...
A meeting of the CG or IG is a meeting of the CG or IG, not an informal meeting of the WG. And that's fine.
@jeffjaffe I think the team undoubtedly has the responsibility to review and comment, and solicit review and comment; I don't question that. But if the team felt that something wasn't...
> If there is a clear mechanism for proposing that the Team moves a charter forward, so that when the Team disagrees, it must explicitly record a decision to reject...
Yes and no. Their choices are the same as the CEO today, notably (a) to support the proposal or (b) return the proposed resolution for further consideration (c) make a...