David Singer

The harm is that you still have not defined who judges what constitutes "strong" so it's subjective.

> I was directed here to assist with the current language in: > > https://www.w3.org/2021/05/W3C_Council_Guide.html > Thank you; I fear you will need to read the comments in this issue,...

There are insightful comments on this topic in an [email thread ](https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/tag/2021Sep/0004.html) on the AB repo, which I would prefer not to replicate here in its entirety. In that thread...

This seems part of a set of issues that seem to have substantial overlap; my comment on #477 applies here. I remain unclear what change to the Process document would...

Transfer to the AB to consider how we check that proposed activities are in scope, aligned with values, and specifically are congruent with the member agreement, and so on. Seems...

Hi Mark, all though I share some of your concerns in principle, our initial triage was based on what is, in effect, happening today; quite a lot of what is...

I think we need to split this into or at least separate questions. Who can take a stab at that? I'm finding this issue a little amorphous to deal with.

The functions that Tim historically filled are the ones that still need doing, and so need either re-assigning or re-conceiving. Indeed, we could also re-imagine other functions as well, in...

> I see chartering as a _strategic_ question. Drafting a charter document once there is a strategic decision to a) work in a particular area, b) define the precise scope...

Thanks for the feedback. At a rough level, * we were trying NOT to create new committees, so the W3C Council, while it serves a new function, is not separately...