Andrey Yegorov
Andrey Yegorov
@lhotari I got rid of byte[] usage and added a feature flag, per your comments
Please fix checkstyle errors to let CI run
@alesharik please add some documentation, rebase, and make sure that the CI passes
@bhiwagade-rahul with the minor version upgrade the CI should be good enough; maybe a short perf run. For the major version upgrade we'd want to test with Apache Pulsar, test...
I think we should first refactor BK client into a separate module that will be built with JDK 8, then we can move BK server to JDK 17 https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/issues/617
Fencing is not exactly a cheap operation for application using BK. E.g. in case of BK as a WAL it may cause app crash/restart/recovery from WAL etc, in other cases...
re-triggering CI by close/open
This change requires a BP and discussion/vote in the mail list
I think this should be configurable. It improves throughput for some workloads, it is possible that more latency-sensitive workloads would want to disable this
> Have you verified any compatible issues from 6.16.x to 9.2.1 and 7.x to 9.2.1? @hangc0276 I fixed/updated backward compat tests, that's it. If these aren't enough we need to...