danny
danny
Do you think attestations should be propagated at the 33rd slot? Or should the condition above be set to `>` rather than `>=`?
I would suggest we get the low-hanging fruit done in this PR, and then consider the deeper scenario testing in a followup. 1. these codepaths aren't tested at all yet...
That seems reasonable!
As discussed with @vbuterin: There is another argument for signing exits with the active signing. In the long term, withdrawal credentials will be a piece of code, or even a...
> just pre-sign a VoluntaryExit message. VoluntaryExits have an `epoch` to prevent being played early or maliciously picked up and replayed on a fork much earlier than intended. A pre-signed...
> Another option would be for the hot key to just pre-sign a VoluntaryExit message. This was discussed on the latest eth2 call (a week and a half ago) and...
Seems like clients are generally moving away from the `net_` dependency in the move to clean things up in the engine api. @nisdas does this require anything from the consensus-specs...
do we want to get this into the test suite prior to the Bellatrix spec release coming soon?
This would not be something that a client would change locally, but rather change across deployments of the eth2 chain. This came up when I was working with some academics...
It seems that stickiness was dropped in #1185 without discussion. It was originally addressing -- https://ethresear.ch/t/beacon-chain-casper-mini-spec/2760/20 We need to discuss if we still need the stickiness of 1 epoch in...