danny
danny
definitely not critical. Might just drop it in there though...
@AgeManning I'd like to get this merge in. Is the PR as it stands still ready for review? Do other clients have any input here?
The intention is per validator. In subsequent phases, the amount of data (subnets) you are required to process is related to the number of validators (and associated roles) attached to...
Agreed that a note could be added to the fork choice to make it clear that an assertion failure in a function should lead to no modifications to the store.
Making these specific to a whisteblower is clever. I was thinking about doing this type of thing for FFG slashings before but couldn't see a good way for validators to...
One feature of DAS is that consensus actors can't even trick you to follow unavailable chains. Thus an alteration of the fork chain to only check since finalized would be...
This is part of the networking mechanism that @protolambda and I were discussing long ago. We might use techniques that require some fractional storage based on p2p-id and lookup in...
Agree with the push
> Should the 'random' word be removed here? As I understand subnet is defined by deterministic function of (peerId, epoch) ? yeah, I guess I mean that you get an...
> it would make validator nodes not so trivially discoverable right! an incredible amount of information is leaked today. > An attacker could craft specific nodeIds and spin up malicious...