Friedel Ziegelmayer
Friedel Ziegelmayer
I think we should be able to parse them, so I think we need to add a dsa key variant of unsupported or similar if the dsa crate is that...
> At last, the tests are fixed. I got to ignore a couple parse errors in the last commit, let me know if you're concerned about that. great news, yeah...
this needs to be an option, if you want to reuse the key it needs to be printed so you can set it using the env variable
Thanks, we usually use openssh key format, for storing the keys, you can see how here: https://github.com/n0-computer/iroh-n0des/blob/main/src/client.rs#L64
personally not a fan, as it mostly creates noise in diffs imho, but if we add it, CI needs to be adjusted to delete it, otherwise we are testing the...
would be nice to avoid the `anyhow` error, but other than that, looks reasonable
This looks pretty good, can you fix the lint issues and move it to ready (it is still marked as draft)?
any updates on this?
Thanks for the quick response, while that works nicely to generate, it does not give me a way to access the trace in a generic fashion as far as I...
how so, if there is already `PartialEq`, to which it could delegate?