Derek Bailey

Yes @mikkelfj I had suggested this independently but I couldn't state if the C bindings would be 100% compatible with those generated by flatc.

@Forchapeatl We haven't implemented it yet.

What we should do first is better separate the includes into the `runtime` components and the `building` components. That way we can better reduce the scope of such a change.

@CasperN

Sounds like a perfect case for a PR.

@Bklyn please open a new issue with having the generated code be snake_case. Do note, I am going to encourage that the schema naming follows our [style guide](https://github.com/google/flatbuffers/blob/master/docs/source/Schemas.md#style-guide).

@bjornharrtell Status on this one?

@callsopp440 Sorry for the delay. I think your asks are OK and reasonable, but I would require PR for them to be implemented, as we don't have any spare cycles...

Following up on this again, where is this at?

Thanks!