David Stone

I usually go with creating a separate child template, compile it to IDOM then pass it in to the parent. Using `browserify` with the `superviewify` transform it could look something...

This has been raised as an [issue](https://github.com/google/incremental-dom/issues/239) with incremental-dom. I usually go with: ``` IncrementalDOM.attributes.value = function (el, name, value) { el.value = value === null || typeof (value) ===...

Yes [that](https://github.com/davidjamesstone/superviews.js/issues/32#issuecomment-242510566) works for me. I can't test it at the moment but I know it works. Is it even calling into the overriding function?

Yes, I see what you mean - [this](https://github.com/davidjamesstone/superviews.js/issues/32#issuecomment-242509387) doesn't seem to work like it used to. Personally, I don't like the `new String()` method. I'd like to see it fixed...

I'm just revisiting this and overriding the `value` or `checked` props now seems to work. I'm not sure what's going on here earlier, whether it was something I was doing...

Thanks for the heads up on skipNode. I'll look into what uses it brings as I'm unsure what it brings at the moment. See this issue for a previous discussions...

Sorry it's taken a while to get back to you. There doesn't seem to be a way to avoid setting a key when statics are used. You can force a...

I'm not sure I would want to encourage this by having the capabilty to unset a key tbh. Elements with statics but without a key can result in adjacent element...

Hi Paul Your first point is already available, although a global config could be a better way of doing it. The `superviews` function takes 3 arguments. The template string is...

> I'm curious: so how does the compiled idom template finds the incremental dom function? How do you inject elementOpen et al into the template's scope? It gets [injected](https://github.com/davidjamesstone/superviewify/blob/master/index.js#L4) by...