David Stewart

ok. There are a few more things to do. I realized that it isn't hard to avoid publishing all the rejected tracks, so things will shake up a little first.

OK, fixed the leak -- error in the looping variable when refactoring the code. The cuts remove quite a few tracks. For one random example: 36 total seeds: 13 rejected...

Hmmm. The cuts are these: * all tracks < 200 MeV * all tracks with < 6 clusters * all tracks with clusters which don't span a radial sector boundary...

The efficiency curves in the QA Juypter notebook haven't changed. I have run individual tests where I didn't think that I saw this behavior. I will get a good comparison...

Now that Michael's changes are in, we should probably be able to push this after we see if it works. There was a clang complaint in that a line of...

I'm not sure at all what I did to upset everything; but obviously my trying to something cut with git had external consequences. I'll push a branch `backup_ghost` that should...

> This is probably a result of the cvmfs issues. Hold off pushing anything Ah, ok. I assumed that I had royally botched a git squash and tried again, and...

Hi @pinkenburg / @osbornjd -- I made this PR on a sphnx interactive node and it ran ok. It is failing the alma9 node builds. Should I log onto an...

> This improves the efficiency in the simulation pretty substantially, do you have some QA checks on the data too? Hey @osbornjd, I looked at the Jupyter QA plots earlier,...

OK, the results on spot checking with actual data are identical. There is a complaint from Valgrind, but there isn't any dynamically allocated memory -- they are all allocated into...