Damien L-G
Damien L-G
Retest this please
Retest this please
Please add to the 4.7 changelog
We should probably make that correction against the current draft instead of P1673. https://eel.is/c++draft/linalg#algs.blas3.rankk The numbers are off.
CC @seyonglee
I looked at the wording and I was wondering whether > Effects: Equivalent to: `operator[](OtherIndexTypes... indices)` with bounds checking is sufficient and you don't need to repeat the constraints. Christian...
Hi Ivo. This is something that is currently not "officially" supported but that we are willing to enable. With ```diff @@ -16,7 +16,7 @@ struct ArborX::AccessTraits } static KOKKOS_FUNCTION auto...
Here is another approach based on callbacks that does not rely on future changes in ArborX ```diff @@ -35,6 +35,29 @@ struct ArborX::AccessTraits } }; +template +struct Filter +{ +...
> Does this also work for a distributed tree search? Yes.
https://godbolt.org/z/3vfv34MK3