Daniel McCarney
Daniel McCarney
Looks like the last push broke a few CI tasks (clippy, docs, fuzz)
> Suggest we merge this minus the last commit, then revisit that in a separate PR. SGTM
> But, until then, I think that might be jumping the gun. Makes sense to me :+1:
I've proposed a handful of items to consider blocking on. I think #1640 is very close and probably uncontroversial. I'm not sure if we want to roll #1774 in as...
Added https://github.com/rustls/rustls/pull/1784 & https://github.com/rustls/rustls/pull/1789 to the list.
Thinking about https://github.com/rustls/rustls/pull/1502 and 0.23 - I don't think it's a must-have, but it might also not be something we could turn around in a 0.23.1. I _think_ (writing this...
Thanks for confirming. I put it in the list as a nice-to-have. Looking forward I think pt2 _could_ be landed without breaking changes so it would be ideal if we...
> Would be nice to get https://github.com/rustls/rustls/pull/1811 in. Added to the list. It's in the merge queue now.
[v0.23.0](https://github.com/rustls/rustls/releases/tag/v%2F0.23.0) was published this morning :rocket:
Are you building with gcc or clang?