Harshvardhan Pandit

The taxonomy no longer appears in Showvoc but is published in the EU Voc pages (which are more official), but the IRIs used are still giving a 404. I have...

The updated / new version of the taxonomy is up at https://showvoc.op.europa.eu/#/datasets/AI_Taxonomy/data The publications office has informed me that the redirections from IRIs to resource pages have not yet been...

(using [dpvbot](https://github.com/coolharsh55/dpv-x/tree/master/dpvbot):) This was discussed in [Meeting 2025-12-10](https://w3id.org/dpv/meetings/meeting-2025-12-10.html)

@DelaramGlp I have the below concepts from generic uses of these terms. I am thinking we can have `ai:ModelLifecycle` for models which is distinct from `ai:LifecycleStage` for an AI system....

I think what we have called "lifecycle stages" should instead be called "development phases" to keep it distinct from the ISO and legally defined lifecycle stages. It should also be...

Use-cases are totally stale because we haven't been maintaining them; In one of the prior meetings we sort of agreed that going forward for v2.3, we will be documenting use-cases...

@TyttiKatariina thanks for creating this thread. I recommend two important actions before we discuss this with the broader group: 1) Resolve the comments so the proposed concepts are clear and...

Thank you Christian. I support this initiatives. Noting a few things which need discussion and confirmation (covered via email before): 1. This is a German law, so the proposed namespace/extension...

(using [dpvbot](https://github.com/coolharsh55/dpv-x/tree/master/dpvbot):) This was discussed in [Meeting 2025-10-15](https://w3id.org/dpv/meetings/meeting-2025-10-15.html)

(using [dpvbot](https://github.com/coolharsh55/dpv-x/tree/master/dpvbot):) This was discussed in [Meeting 2025-11-12](https://w3id.org/dpv/meetings/meeting-2025-11-12.html) Updates from Julian