Francesco Casella

@perost, I guess we have some more basic issues to fix here, sorry for this ticket becoming a bit crowded. Please consider this MWE: ```modelica package TestArrayConnect connector Port Real...

@ernestokofman, is your array connect algorithm meant to also work with multi-dimensional arrays?

> Ok, so this is a bit of a mess. Let's try to sort things out nicely then 😄 > * If you only use `-d=nonfScalarize` then you get the...

> @rfranke can perhaps comment on whether the non-scalarized test cases are still relevant for him, and whether he really needs the specific behaviour of the connection handling that they...

Plan after webmeeting on Dec 2: - [X] OK to have divided splitting and scalarization of connectors into two phase in #9733 - [x] if `-d=arrayConnect` is set, the array...

@perost did you manage tasks 2 and 3 above? I'm eager to see what happens with the new backend when it is passed correct connection equations. Thanks!

@bilderbuchi I need to go for one more full rounds of ExternalMedia tests before finally making the releases. Too much stuff in the pipeline...

@bilderbuchi thanks for reporting. Unfortunately, this stems from a basic issue, which is discussed in modelica/ModelicaSpecification#2191 ad OpenModelica/OpenModelica#9029: there is currently no guaranteed way to access ModelicaError from externally compiled...

> Ah, that sounds like gnarly problem. It is 😓 > I understand the problem I think and accept that it happens and this is unavoidable for the time being....

As in #12111, this model has sample(hold(v)). There may be some problem with that, we need to investigate it. @paultjevdh please ping me again in a couple of weeks if...