Bugra Ozturk

> > @bugraoz93 The static checks are not automatically fixed. Could you please tell me how to resolve these checks? > > Fixed It was quite busy days for me...

Hey @Prab-27, can you please rebase the branch? We can directly merge it afterwards. I can also do it if you don't have time

A different channel could be beneficial, allowing only those who want to read it. We still need to check the CI channel as well

I addressed the comments. Thanks for the review! Some parts turned out to be more complex than I imagined. It still needs small touches and should be ready with unit...

@pierrejeambrun this is ready for review. I removed the WIP earlier but forgot to ping you again :sweat_smile: Please when you have time, thanks!

> Great. > > Looking good, just a few suggestions / improvement on the code, but nothing blocking. > > I'll also let Brent double check that the interface corresponds...

> Great work! This will power so much of the new UI! > > In the old UI we also included the note for both dag runs and task instances....

> Can you also plug the new common filters `include_upstream` and `include_downstream` in `structure_data` (`structure.py`) I already included this in the previous commit, updating that endpoint params according to changes...

> After more manual testing. It looks like we have a few issues. > > Using the `example_task_group` Dag: > > * `section_1` is correct if everything runs normally. But...

> This is coming along well! Thanks for all your patience as I test this endpoint out more and more. My pleasure! I am happy that we ensuring everything will...