AIP-81 Transition of Version Command

[Prab-27]

closes : #45670

Implement Version Command on the CLI side

---

^ Add meaningful description above Read the Pull Request Guidelines for more information. In case of fundamental code changes, an Airflow Improvement Proposal (AIP) is needed. In case of a new dependency, check compliance with the ASF 3rd Party License Policy. In case of backwards incompatible changes please leave a note in a newsfragment file, named {pr_number}.significant.rst or {issue_number}.significant.rst, in airflow-core/newsfragments.

[Prab-27]

Adding ActionCommand requires a deep dive since it is not working as expected. I'm working on fixing it

[Prab-27]

cc: @bugraoz93

If that's okay, I'll add the tests tomorrow.

[Prab-27]

I need to update some code. I will make the changes tomorrow morning as soon as possible

[Prab-27]

Using Version_operation and api_client.version.get() both cases it will show this logging :

[2025-05-29T11:14:08.670+0000] {_client.py:1026} INFO - HTTP Request: GET http://localhost:8080/api/v2/version "HTTP/1.1 200 OK" then version_dict

Could you please help me prevent this message from appearing

[Prab-27]

cc : @bugraoz93

[bugraoz93]

Using Version_operation and api_client.version.get() both cases it will show this logging :

[2025-05-29T11:14:08.670+0000] {_client.py:1026} INFO - HTTP Request: GET http://localhost:8080/api/v2/version "HTTP/1.1 200 OK" then version_dict

Could you please help me prevent this message from appearing

Thanks for tagging @Prab-27! I missed this. I will look, but we can handle this disabled log in a separate PR. Let's first finish the version command and merge it. I think that part should be disabled in the client that will apply to all commands. Great catch!

[Prab-27]

Using Version_operation and api_client.version.get() both cases it will show this logging : [2025-05-29T11:14:08.670+0000] {_client.py:1026} INFO - HTTP Request: GET http://localhost:8080/api/v2/version "HTTP/1.1 200 OK" then version_dict Could you please help me prevent this message from appearing

Thanks for tagging @Prab-27! I missed this. I will look, but we can handle this disabled log in a separate PR. Let's first finish the version command and merge it. I think that part should be disabled in the client that will apply to all commands. Great catch!

Thanks !! I'll start working on this in a couple of days

[Prab-27]

@bugraoz93 The static checks are not automatically fixed. Could you please tell me how to resolve these checks?

[Prab-27]

Can I copy - paste from the main branch to fix this check? I don't have enough knowledge about these files

[Prab-27]

@bugraoz93 The static checks are not automatically fixed. Could you please tell me how to resolve these checks?

Fixed

[bugraoz93]

@bugraoz93 The static checks are not automatically fixed. Could you please tell me how to resolve these checks?

Fixed

It was quite busy days for me so I couldn't give some pointers. It's great to see it is fixed! Thanks a lot, @Prab-27! I will check this in detail soon

[bugraoz93]

Hey @Prab-27, can you please rebase the branch? We can directly merge it afterwards. I can also do it if you don't have time