Bugra Ozturk
Bugra Ozturk
Hello @ashb, thanks for your comment. I wrote a bit-long comment, sorry about that. I tried to think loudly to explain my thoughts on the issue and implementation. Yes, the...
Hey @jhtimmins, @XD-DENG, and @kaxil, I wrongly removed you as a reviewer from the PR while trying to request a review. Sorry about that. If you have time, please review...
Hey @ashb and @potiuk, should I continue to the implementation and finalize the PR? Are you okay with the approach of the implementation and idea of having this feature?
Thank you both for your time and comments @ashb and @potiuk! I will think about a solution. I understood your points. I thought to use the existing Owner field and...
Thanks a lot, @potiuk for your guidance and for showing me the way of involving in a detailed way. I will do those things as a start and will try...
Thanks for creating the ticket @pierrejeambrun! Let me take connection endpoints
Thanks for assigning! Let me save you from regular updates :) I created issues for all the endpoints in connections.
I am planning to work on all of them @pierrejeambrun. if you can assign them to me, that would be great! Thanks :)
Is anyone working on this? I believe we should reschedule this to 3.1+ otherwise
> Using `Version_operation` and `api_client.version.get()` both cases it will show this logging : > > `[2025-05-29T11:14:08.670+0000] {_client.py:1026} INFO - HTTP Request: GET http://localhost:8080/api/v2/version "HTTP/1.1 200 OK" ` then version_dict >...