bt90
bt90
Inodes are looking good
While it doesn't solve the underlying problem, the suggestion in #11034 may at least improve usability.
> Yes, from a single-user instance. > > ``` > EXPLAIN for: SELECT "accounts"."username", "accounts"."domain", "accounts"."private_key", "accounts"."public_key", "accounts"."created_at", "accounts"."updated_at", "accounts"."note", "accounts"."display_name", "accounts"."uri", "accounts"."url", "accounts"."avatar_file_name", "accounts"."avatar_content_type", "accounts"."avatar_file_size", "accounts"."avatar_updated_at", "accounts"."header_file_name", "accounts"."header_content_type", "accounts"."header_file_size",...
ProGuard :thinking:
Let's dissect this: ``` INFO: Couldn't add port mapping for 192.168.1.11 (external port 43417 -> internal port 22000/TCP): UPnP Error: ConflictInMappingEntry (718) ``` Your router won't accept the mapping because...
> Or it is because we already have a mapping on that port Conflict detection is based on the tuple `external port + internal IP + internal port`. Unless the...
The problem is that we can't tell if that port is occupied by other nodes or if we already have our port mapped. If we can live without predictable external...
As this only works for IGDv2, we would either have to keep the retry logic for IGDv1, or do the sensible thing and drop IGDv1 support. A router that supports...
Going back to your initial logs, could you explain which IPs are assigned to this machine? * `192.168.1.11` * `192.168.201.90`