Björn Rabenstein
Björn Rabenstein
Maybe. I'll comment on that issue.
Hopefully we will discuss the more general SD topic and this issue in particular at tomorrow's dev summit. It would also be good to hear @roidelapluie's opinion about this.
We didn't get to the SD topic at the dev summit, sorry for that. And still no message from @roidelapluie .
Finally an update: We talked about this during the dev-summit. My understanding is that we would most prefer to simply make you (and/or coworkers of yours) maintainers of the new...
`common` is a bag of commonly used packages. Previously, some of it was part of `client_golang`, which was back then an even bigger bag with a misleading name on top....
I don't really see us addressing this issue and I'm tempted to close it as "not feasible". @TheTincho how are you dealing with this at the moment?
OK, thanks. I'll close this then because realistically, I don't see us changing the repo structure, given that a workaround for Debian is in place.
/cc @bboreham as the 2.55 release shepherd (and also the person that said "This looks like it should be backported to release-2.55 branch." ;)
Sorry about this getting dragged on for so (too) long. With release shepherd's comment above, I'll close this as it is unlikely to land. (We can still re-open and continue...
Thank you very much. This needs a review by one of our UI experts.