Ben Wilson

PR welcome for this.

In this case, the recommended course of action is to use the KV source. The Ecto source exists to interface with Ecto schemas.

Closing as a lot has changed, please reopen with a test case if this is still an issue.

@thecynicalpaul you could `|> Absinthe.Pipeline.replace(Phase.Document.Result, {Phase.Document.Result, opts})` I believe.

The PR has no tests, and it also says that it isn't the best solution.

Tests would be very helpful.

Fixed by https://github.com/absinthe-graphql/absinthe/pull/1226

Hi @andersonmcook I am open to merging this but there are now merge conflicts as you anticipated. Please reopen once those are fixed, thanks!

This has been handled by #1223

This has since been implemented in a different PR.