Bruce D'Arcus

If other reviewers approve the substantive change, we can add the logic to the schema, which is here: https://github.com/citation-style-language/schema/blob/master/schemas/styles/csl.sch

> Please format this change as one-sentence-per-line rather than 80-characters-per-line. This document isn't currently formatted that way. I'll see if I can find a script to automate the conversion.

> Yes, but we have started in a few places to add new additions that way to reduce later changes. Ah. I experimented a bit, and concluded a completely automated...

> But that won't give you a line per sentence, would it? Yes; the `fill-paragraph` command converts this: ``` One line per sentence. One line. Per sentence. ``` ... to...

> Will this work with one space after a period as well? No, it's not very smart as is. But I wouldn't run this on an entire file; more paragraph-by-paragraph,...

> I think this can apply to any name or standard variable. Really? Maybe a couple/few examples, with at least one name?

Great example. Also "bell hooks". > But where would that be exposed as a problem? Don't we assume no messing with case in names; that the data represents the proper...

How would that relate to italic/emphasis? On Wed, Dec 16, 2020, 10:57 AM Brenton M. Wiernik wrote: > In terms of common field markup, we should also consider underlining. >...

This is tied to a larger discussion of how we will deal with mapping input subfield formatting to output. Generally speaking, over the long history of typography, italics and underlines...

> If the style field is italic and a word is marked up to be underlined, that word would be italic and underlined. If it were marked up to be...