Bruce D'Arcus
Bruce D'Arcus
Thanks for this @coryschires! As I said on discourse, I'd oddly enough never come across this. I think an easy way to support this would be to add two new...
So we should figure this out. I've assigned this to everyone that might have some good ideas.
So we think this is ideally added in a spec addition, and does not require style syntax changes?
> @adam3smith My sense is that this is almost universally required? Does it need to be customizable? I'm skeptical whether all, or even most, styles would require this, so maybe...
I'm pretty sure I've never seen it in my field. Parentheses simply get suppressed within a citation. Another question: we have two big examples, both author-date. Does that apply outside...
> Regarding the name for the option: `normalize-nested-parentheses` ? Nice! And presumably the value should not be a boolean, given the UK example you found? Is it an option available...
I think maybe we have been looking at this case differently. When I see this: > (see [Doe, 2018] for some on foo bar) ... I saw that entire content...
I'll take a closer look tomorrow, but your examples here are what I think @bwiernik was assuming; that the stuff in parenthesis is just part of the body text, and...
I think we really have two cases here; let me use the pandoc syntax (where the brackets designate the citation] to make clear: 1. **author-date citation with affixes**: `[see @doe18...
> My understanding is that we are talking about version 2. > I don't think version 1 is currently a problem at all: > [see @doe18 for some on foo...