Bruce D'Arcus

@d-r-a-b - just looking at your earlier note a bit more closely. > I can't think of a reason why norg couldn't have `{= universal prefix; prefix @key suffix; ....

_edited for clarity_ > In theory, a third-party could either write additional backends for the `org-cite` analogue, or they could write their entirely own macro library much like `org-ref` was...

> Is there really a difference in the model just because the syntax looks a bit different? Absolutely not. I do indeed mean model; the abstractions behind the syntax. >...

@d-r-a-b Yeah, there is no real CSL API, though I think we have enough experience and implementations to define one. > I haven't found a place that really describes how...

> Is there anything you've run into that the model generated by citations using `org-cite` has been unable to handle? No. As I said, it's just an iterative improvement on...

> Just to clarify, was this comment interleaved correctly? It was awkward; just meant to agree with you in that, and suggest there's no reason to allow only one. >...

> I really dislike their parse method if this is correct. Pandoc has some additional options to handle the problems you note, I believe, using TeX-like brackets. These data issues...

I'm not really sure, but suspect it has to do with the fact that ivy includes actions support (mentioned in the excerpt you quoted), and selectrum etc don't. If that's...

Although, I just realized pandoc will do this conversion.

From a quick look, seems like yes, given that it hooks up at the (LuaTeX) engine level. There'd just need to be some sort of ConTeXt layer on top of...