Bruce D'Arcus
Bruce D'Arcus
I can see that. But the primer is making recommendations implicitly about how to do this (the "After making changes ..." bit).
> Maybe we should recommend atom instead of emacs? Yes; see [the little package](https://github.com/bdarcus/atomic-csl) I created for atom. I'm happy to move the repo to csl if there's any interest...
Can close this; right @bwiernik?
The discussions about this are spread across different places, but the consensus has been that while it's an important feature, it is indeed out of scope for CSL. Put differently,...
That's a good point. Maybe we can add an issue on the documentation repo tracker for this?
Moving to documentation, for possible incorporation into a new API appendix of the specification.
I think it makes sense. We could approve an issue for that, and link to this.
As you can see, I created a new issue and linked to this.
I don't see how the narrative content per se is relevant to whether it's ibid, which simply means the same source as the last cited one. Obviously people can abuse...
Is this now RTM?