Jim Balhoff

And for the BGLAP model mentioned above: |?gp1 |?mf1 |?cc1 |?bp1 |?relation |?gp2 |?mf2 |?cc2 |?bp2 |?model | |---------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------| ||||||||||| ||| ||||||||

@kltm just an information example for now. We can do curies in the end. But I want to check that I'm pulling out the right stuff.

@cmungall specifying the order of transitive part-ofs might require a different approach; I'm using SPARQL right now, nice and simple but property paths don't capture that. If we're okay with...

With some BP and CC aggregation (unordered): |?gp1 |?mf1 |?cc1s |?bp1s |?relation |?gp2 |?mf2 |?cc2s |?bp2s |?model | |----------------|----------|----------|--------------------------------|----------|----------------|----------|----------|--------------------------------|------------------------| |UniProtKB:P02818|GO:0005179|GO:0005576|GO:0007420,GO:0050890,GO:0001956|RO:0002413|UniProtKB:Q5T848|GO:0004888|GO:0005886|GO:0007420,GO:0050890,GO:0001956|gomodel:645d887900000758| |UniProtKB:P38435|GO:0008488| |GO:0017187 |RO:0002630|UniProtKB:P02818|GO:0005179|GO:0005576|GO:0007420,GO:0050890,GO:0001956|gomodel:645d887900000758|

> @balhoff I'm noticing here that some `rdf_uri_prefix`s trailing slashes and some don't; do you know what the use is here and whether that matters? @kltm I don't think trailing...

@kltm CHEBI participants are here linked via RO:0000057: https://golr-staging.geneontology.io/solr/select?defType=edismax&qt=standard&indent=on&wt=json&rows=10&start=0&fl=*,score&facet=true&facet.mincount=1&facet.sort=count&json.nl=arrarr&facet.limit=25&hl=true&hl.simple.pre=%3Cem%20class=%22hilite%22%3E&hl.snippets=1000&fq=document_category:%22ontology_class%22&q=id:%22GO:0103020%22

I don't think logical definitions in general will be so easy though.

For particularly listing the chemical reaction participants, then RO:0000057 will be relation.

@kltm was there a switch from go-gaf to go-lego in Amigo?

I see, this connection from worm nuclei to GO nucleus is not in go-gaf but in WBbt, which is also being loaded into GOLR.