Alex Beregszaszi

@krzkaczor it would be appreciated. Please also rebase :)

This is an ancient commit, but will fix this once 0.6.0 is done.

A lot of the tests have been added by #419, but there are still a few things outstanding.

@yann300 what was this change for?

Need to add a test case to verify this. So basically the test case would use `findLinkReferences` with an old style link reference (`__LibraryName_____...`) ?

Can you please explain the reasons and benefits?

> I ran into a similar issue, and ended up forking solc-js just to remove the asm. Still confused what was removed?

But that shouldn't be included through packaging when the dependent package uses `var solc= require('solc/wrapper)`. If it is, that must be an issue of the packaging system.

You mean shipped on a node installation, but at least it doesn't affect webpack?

As we've discussed above webpack is not affected. I'd like to also separate things, but it is not that simple and can become even worse if done recklessly. Either we...