Sanskar Jaiswal

I can't reproduce this, could you please provide your `Canary` definition and what your services look like (kubectl describe svc -n ) when using v1.21.0 and v1.22.0 respectively? Thanks :)

@Apollorion Ideally, the weights for the `primary` is 0 and 100 for the `canary` for the traffic rule which matches against the header. Could you share the definition of the...

I think there might be a misconception about how A/B tests actually work in Flagger. Flagger doesn't do any weighted routing when you want to do a A/B test. All...

Hello @pitiwari @ryanjwh, thank you for raising this PR. Support for session affinity during progressive delivery is planned and will be implemented soon. Having gone through your PR, introducing a...

If the intention is to have a webhook that runs before a canary is finalized/succeeds OR a canary is rolled back, then `ConfirmFinalizing` isn't the correct name for that, since...

I don't see preserving the HPA count from a previous time, falls within the scope of Flagger. We don't want to interfere with how HPAs work, Flagger merely creates a...

Because of the entry "mesh" in `.spec.service.gateways`, Flagger will generate a `VirtualService` that would be applied to all the sidecars in the mesh, which would result in it being applied...

No, Flagger needs a way to set weight based or header based routing to backend services to perform perform progressive delivery or A/B testing. You can use Gateway API instead...

This is the payload that Flagger sends to webhooks: ```json { "name": "podinfo", "namespace": "test", "phase": "Progressing", "metadata": { "test": "all", "token": "16688eb5e9f289f1991c" } } ``` This is not compatible...

That's not an issue, please rebase and force push.