Arfon Smith
Arfon Smith
I'm not sure, I feel pretty sure I've seen 'No affiliation' and 'None' before. What term the authors use is up to them.
This is something we're definitely interested in doing, but there is a maintenance burden to produce HTML output which is why we moved away from this. One small point -...
We don't have an automatic way of doing this - although I think this would be a very nice feature for us to implement. We have written in the past...
We've just added a (possibly related) feature to make it possible to see all of the papers reviewed by someone e.g. https://joss.theoj.org/papers/reviewed_by/@gradvohl
> Whatever ends up being automated to satisfy the needs of this issue, it would be nice if it were something directly useful for publons. (Honestly, maybe the auto-generated list...
> JOSS already includes the DOI of the software archive as a `` of the article metadata. Maybe for articles in collaboration with AAS it can also include the DOI...
Thanks for spotting this @shivupa - it looks like we had a stale search index which I've now regenerated.
Hrm, there's something weird going on here. I fixed the index this morning but it now seems to be out of date again. I'm going to keep digging into this...
> In my opinion, all of the people who contributed to the work to be published (the software project and the paper) should agree on who should be authors. :+1:...
> Can we add a sample review checklist in the about page, so that new reviewers can see more precisely what they will be checking? As a short-term fix here...