Arfon Smith

@danielskatz can we close this? I feel like the changes we made to the docs have substantially improved this.

Good idea. I’ve labelled this for now and will add to the backlog.

Good idea. Unfortunately we don't currently have this captured in the metadata anywhere for the submissions but I agree this would be a neat thing to be able to search...

Possibly, although packages that focus on visualisation are generally out of scope for JOSS. Looking at the repo, it's a little challenging to figure out where the main contributions from...

Apologies for the slow reply. This looks like it would be out of scope for us sorry. Mostly because it looks like it would fall foul of our [substantial scholarly...

This is already part of what our authors do, the tags include domain labels which are shown on the paper view page (e.g. https://joss.theoj.org/papers/10.21105/joss.01834) and https://joss.theoj.org/papers/tagged/exoplanets . > Then one...

:wave: @matthewfeickert, thanks for opening this. I agree versioning is important and I would be useful to have this available in the paper. For the motivated reader, the version is...

@matthewfeickert - I know I owe you a proper response here, just super-busy with other things right now sorry 😞. I've not forgotten this though :-)

Yes, this is a great idea! We're actually exploring something like this right now. / cc @xuanxu for visibility.

We don't actually persist this anywhere currently but we could. We generate the PDF using this command: https://github.com/openjournals/whedon/blob/master/lib/whedon/processor.rb#L152-L171, the Pandoc tex template is here https://github.com/openjournals/whedon/blob/master/resources/latex.template