Alex Jentsch

@Chao1009 This is very helpful, but why do the individual detector entries not seem to fill anytime, but "all_ff" does - what is it actually checking?

Why does the e_beamline have anything to do with protons?

Ah okay, so if you have a significant number of particles hitting the electron beam-pipe, then you likely don't have the crossing angle applied. What input sample are you using...

Okay, then you need to make sure the particles have the -25mrad crossing angle applied, otherwise the angular range is hard to make sense of. On Wed, Aug 30, 2023...

Ahh okay this is good to know. I will do some tests with that in mind to see if I can get the visualization to work. It's just odd because...

@simonge have the quad fields been confirmed yet? I will approve once your question has been answered by either @adamjaro or @nat93 to make sure things are correct.

This will create overlaps with the new cryostat geometry.

[B0behaviour_4Nov25.pdf](https://github.com/user-attachments/files/23342745/B0behaviour_4Nov25.pdf) The problem started in July. The geometry/hits are okay from month to month, it's the tracking itself that seems problematic. Thanks to Oliver for making the comparison plots.

Hey guys, Here are file paths to necessary "analysis" scripts, etc. **Analysis script + header:** /gpfs02/eic/ajentsch/ePIC_dd4hep_simulations/analysis/dvcsAnalysis/analyze_DVCS_eicrecon.C /gpfs02/eic/ajentsch/ePIC_dd4hep_simulations/analysis/dvcsAnalysis/detectorResolution.h (better to run with "root -b", or to comment out the lines where...

@veprbl I do not understand this. The adjustment to the geometry was only on the tiny section of the tracker which is between the beam pipes. That would only affect...