agrimony

To measure the impact, we could track the growth of the French social media channels (e.g. twitter followers, telegram participants)

Like what Don mentioned, we can shift requirements and table up to Rationale, and leave recommendations under Specification Also, can rename EVM tooling -> compatibility. Otherwise looks good to go!

small formatting issue where "Takers" is different format than "Makers" Small typos in "Market size / 24h" and "Compatibility"

Changing this up to focus on establishing a team to assess suitability at the moment, suggesting # Specification A team comprising of devs and ambassadors will be created to explore...

Chains will be assessed in the following manner - The chain needs to be EVM compatible with reliable timestamps - The chain needs to have sufficient volume and liquidity -...

astholder May 21 Makers are responsible for their own implementation and strategies et al. This is a nice idea in theory but in practice we find it impractical because of...

oh yeah, the name probably can be changed haha. "Migration" sounds like the whole AirSwap will move to Polygon. Probably can just call it "Deploy AirSwap on Polygon"

> > > We can also try to apply for grant https://polygon.technology/developer-support-program/ Yes! we should look at the availability of dev grant programs for sure!

agrimony Jun 2 Some quick thoughts - Would it be a simpler set up to implement this in the form of a fee rebate? e.g. set aside a portion of...

**Just putting this down as a thought experiment - all numbers here are arbitrarily chosen.** ### Tagging fee discounts to NFTs Stakers can mint an NFT (or maybe airdrop to...