agrimony

astholder Mar 20 As the author - I think the largest hurdle to overcome with this proposal is how to objectively assess ‘quality engagement’. Perhaps Discord analytics can help remove...

if its not too late, can you also add links to the relevant pools?

hm the last i tried, only the OP can edit, so go ahead and update it once we are done with the draft :)

seems ok now. only had it once off, might be an edge case when things are slower to load?

Updates to the staking contract - using `extend` to add to current stakes. This would allow all stakes from a single wallet to be consolidated into one event, saving gas...

also, `extendFor` should not be allowed to change `vestingLength`. This will prevent attacking of a person's wallet by allowing a different person to extend the `vestingLength` of his current stake

agrimony Feb 16 I guess if the price of AST is deemed to be too high at that point in time, the claimant can always choose not to convert rewards...

> Points payout via activate should award higher % of points for addresses with longer `vestingLengths` > > e.g. > > * 12 weeks: 75% > * 20 weeks: 100%...

whats the maximum subscription length? will probably need to define a time period (e.g. buy a subscription for 1 year)

> Strongly disagree with this AIP. > > 1. Don't think this will smooth the claim process and multiple pools already solve this. > > 2. there are 0.8% swap...