Stefan Agner

Hm, good point, I guess we would prefer to make the two behave the same. As discussed already in https://github.com/home-assistant/operating-system/issues/3935#issuecomment-2761167096, it's not really the plan to add buildkit to Home...

> When building add-ons using Supervised, it usually has docker buildkit because it is part of a normal docker installation process. I've tried to look into force using non-BuildKit builds....

> > What is the effective differences you are seeing? Maybe just having it installed (but not used) lead to diffferent results? Or maybe it is down to the Docker...

@vothar It seems the Supervisor fails to take the backup when notifying the Core that a backup is about to be taken. Is there really nothing else in the Core...

@dependabot rebase

Since there were more SIMD optimization, I'd like to wait bumping orjson again until Core got shipped with a newer version just like with the 3.10.6 bump.

2024.9.0 got released, no indication of orjson issue from what I can tell. Still worth waiting for a couple of days before we ship orjson in Supervisor, but we'll not...

> Unfortunately, we do: https://github.com/home-assistant/core/blob/763f2bcfcc697a59802c873078cd3750141013e1/homeassistant/components/homeassistant_hardware/firmware_config_flow.py#L261-L271 > > This will have to be replaced to use the firmware flasher in Core directly. Hm I see. I guess I could also retain...

Typically this happens when there are two Home Assistant OS installation, on the SSD and on a internal SD card as well. If that is the case, probably best is...

Let's track it in #3227 as this seems to be the issue with most information at this point.