Alexandre Conrad-Dormoy

> Should we really make a `hide columns` feature or rather a `show columns` feature. The latter might allow then to specify a ordering of the columns like `default` or...

Hi @kinow, can you provide some samples of what the coverage file looks like, what pycobertura reports, and what you'd like to see? I haven't worked much with branch coverage...

Interesting, thanks for sharing @kinow. I didn't know about the `condition-coverage`. What is the status of `branch="true"` when the line coverage is not 100%? Can you share another example where...

I see a few tasks here: * Allow the [Cobertura parser](https://github.com/aconrad/pycobertura/blob/master/pycobertura/cobertura.py#L33) to understand partial coverage. We currently parse lines and return a tuple [`(line_number, line_status)`](https://github.com/aconrad/pycobertura/blob/c3a88bb59aa949153a4480a64a59789e76bae5ac/pycobertura/cobertura.py#L167) but `line_status` is either `True`...

Trying to take a stab at this...

In the summary table, when listing missing lines, does it make sense if we count partial lines as missed? I'm not sure I want to introduce a "partial" column, I...

@kinow Would #168 work for you? I haven't colorized the outputs to orange for partially covered statements where relevant, but the data should be in place.

I've been playing with it a bit and I've been surprised by a few things. For-loops are measured as conditionals branches. At first, I didn't understand because, to me, for-loops...

Another thing noteworthy about the partially hit for-loop: the `missing-branches` attribute in the XML file says that the unmet conditional is the line _before_ it (line 335). The code never...

> Are you planning to add both line & branch coverage? I think the pytest-cov HTML report shows both the old stmts/missing, as well as branches/covered. I'm not convinced I...