Alexandre Conrad-Dormoy

> That won't be helpful in my case, I think. At the moment I get the Markdown report of pycobertura and post it to the GitHub REST API to create...

@kinow Here's a sample output in markdown using the tilde `~` as the partial marker, what do you think? | Filename | Stmts | Miss | Cover | Missing |...

> I think I still miss being able to see how much is branch-covered or not. I can see the numbers for line coverage (stmts / miss), but not branch...

Hey @tilgovi, would you mind rebasing since coverage reports should be fixed in master?

I have the same issue. How did you workaround it?

Thanks for your report. I have a pull request I'm working on for partial coverage. It's currently not supported but I lost steam and I haven't made progress on it...

That's the PR: https://github.com/aconrad/pycobertura/pull/168 If I recall the code supports partial coverage but I still need to update the renderers to make them aware of partial coverage. I think that's...

Hi @raman-nareika, My guess is that it is due to the fact that you have deleted covered lines (the code duplication). You might be hitting this [use case](https://github.com/aconrad/pycobertura?tab=readme-ov-file#why-is-the-number-of-uncovered-lines-used-as-the-metric-to-check-if-code-coverage-worsened-rather-than-the-line-rate) from the...

If you are asking about the discrepancy with the percentages at the _top_ of your screenshots under the "method health" section, then I'm unfamiliar with this UI. Does it come...

I have a PR [here](https://github.com/OpenAPITools/openapi-generator/pull/18933) where I attach the http response to `ResponseError`. It's currently being passed but it doesn't do anything with it, the response is just dropped. With...