aarppe

We changed spelling relaxation in the analyzing FST so that a preverb-final vowel can be dropped in all circumstances (If that somehow results from initial change, that shouldn't matter, but...

Yes, _êsi-_ would need to be specified as a preverb in the LEXC source, for verb forms with _êsi-_ to be recognized.

Probably, the table/subpane header should have a width independent of the column headings in the subpane. And as probably, this header width should be the width of the entire table.

This is provided as an option (`espt:1`) in the primary search, but not yet made available via the paradigms/cells.

There, we have an underlying accented , which doesn't get coded as a special non-collapsing case. So that needs to get fixed at some point, cf. in verb_stems.lexc `miyêw:miý VTA...

This is yet current, though how to solve it is another question.

Concerning how to distinguish linguistic content (the cells that the FST generates) from the row and column labels, #568 has a relevant observation/suggestion, based on old NDS, as illustrated in...

Beyond the above, there are some elements in #505, namely: - [ ] showing optionally morpheme boundaries (option b.) - [ ] showing the English phrase translations as pop-ups to...

Almost all of the above is in line with our, and my, previous conceptions of the nature and contents of an entry (in specific for individual word-forms), with the exception...

**[Switched pointer to paradigms to be (specific) wordclass]** Couldn't we just have as a possible value in the (FST) analysis field something like NULL, i.e. no analysis? The inflectional category...