a3nm
I understand -- having a link to reply to the comment (ideally without having to log in) would be already something. At TheoretiCS, having confused editors who directly reply to...
Hi, this is an interesting feature for TheoretiCS too, but the page https://theoretics.episciences.org/browse/accepted-docs doesn't exist yet. Is it possible for us to have a similar page? (The page we currently...
Hi, thanks for clarifying. This looks great! That said, in addition to the 1970 dates, there is a useless h2 title on the page: "Papers accepted on TheoretiCS" (in addition...
Hi @rtournoy , we have another request from TheoretiCS: people in the journal worry that the arXiv link to papers may be misinterpreted (readers would think it's the accepted version...
Hi @rtournoy , the text from our current manually updated "Coming soon" page is: "The following articles have been accepted to TheoretiCS and will be published soon. (The final versions...
Thanks @rtournoy ! This looks fine, but with just one caveat. When there are no accepted articles in this list, we would want the page to show some different text,...
Isn't this a duplicate of #119?
We are also having this problem for TheoretiCS, it would be great to fix this so that the DOIs can work correctly also for registered users.
We would also need this at TheoretiCS for editors. (I think it is already possible for reviewers.)
By the way, I think this is related to #180